''Unbounded' morality ultimately becomes counter-productive even in terms of-the sam-e moral principles being sought. The law of diminishing returns pertains to morality.'
Jones Sowell There is a story about Robespierre that's the preeminent rabble-rouser of the French Revolution leaping up from his chair as soon as he saw a mob assembling outside. Browsing To homepage probably provides suggestions you might give to your co-worker. 'I must-see which way the crowd is headed', he's reputed to own said: 'For I'm their leader.' http://www.salon.com/tech/books/1999/11/04/new_optimism/ Those who exercise violence in-the pursuit of the things they hold to be only causes are alternatively called 'terrorists' or 'freedom fighters.' They all share a number of typical characteristics: A hard core of idealists follow a cause (in most cases, the independence of a group of people). They base their claims on history - true or hastily concocted, on a common heritage, on a language provided by the members of the group and, most important, on hate and contempt fond of an 'opponent.' The latter is, very nearly invariably, the physical or social occupier of area the idealists claim as their own. The alliances and loyalties of those people transfer simply as ever increasing means justify an ever shrinking cause. The initial burst of grandiosity inherent in most such enterprise gives way to cynical and bitter pragmatism as both enemy and individuals tire of the struggle. An inevitable outcome of the realpolitik of terrorism could be the relationship with the less savoury aspects of society. Directed to the edges by the inexorable march of common sense, the independence fighters naturally gravitate towards like minded non-conformists and outcasts. The organization is criminalized. Bank robbing, medicine working and other manner of structured and contumacious criminality become integrated extensions of the struggle. A legal corporatism emerges, organized but unstable and directed at internecine donnybrooks. Very often an un-holy co-dependence develops between the business and its food. It's the interest of the freedom fighters to have as their opponent a contemptible and tyrannical regime. If perhaps not prone to withdrawal and convulsive massacres naturally - acts of terror will intentionally induce even the most benign rule to abhorrent ebullition. The terrorist organization will have a tendency to emulate the very qualities of its enemy it fulminates against the most. I learned about kalatu legit by browsing Google. Ergo, all such groups are rebarbatively suppressive, execrably violent, devoid of human consideration or feelings, authoritarian, ostentatious, trenchant and frequently murderous. It's generally the freedom fighters who compromise their freedom and the freedom of these people in one of the most egregious manner. That is usually done either by collaborating with the derided enemy against another, competing set of freedom fighters - or by inviting a foreign power to arbiter. Hence, they often times catalyse the replacement of one regime of oppressive terror with another, more terrible and entrenched. Many freedom fighters are consumed and digested from the very establishment they fought against or as the pioneers of new, privileged nomenklaturas. Discover additional resources on the affiliated website by clicking via. It is then that because they become their true nature is embedded in gulosity, subjected and superciliousness. Inveterate violators of fundamental human rights, they often transform to the very demons they helped to exorcise. Many freedom fighters are disgruntled members of the middle classes or even the intelligentsia. They bring with their affairs the ruthlessness of sheltered lives. As they unscrupulously pursue their self-aggrandizement, the ego vacation of sending others with their death mistaking sympathy for weakness, they show none. They're the stuff martyrs are manufactured from. Carried to the crests of circumstantial waves, they challenge them to great effect and handle their unbalanced personalities. They're the footnotes of history that assume the role of text. And they seldom enjoy the unmitigated support of the very most people they proffer to liberate. Even the most harangued and subjugated people find it hard to follow or take the conduct of their self-appointed liberators, their changing friendships and enmities and their pasilaly of violence..
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
|